U.S.P.S. For Sale

Why not, the government clearly cannot keep it sustainable in a changing market place.  The olde style business model has been updated from when they were established, but does not allow the USPS to remain a viable competitor in the free market.

Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe attempted to propose a free market solution to keep the USPS soluble, but was quickly rejected for many reasons amongst them where:

·         Closing 3,700 Locations

·         Consolidating hundreds of distribution centers

This proposal was an unfortunate necessity to stay soluble.  Instead, politicians rejected it to foot the bill to the American people who obviously do not utilize their services as they once did.  We pay the Post Office if we use them or not.  Does that make sense?

Common Sense says:  That does not make any sense on any level to anyone who has a level of basic business knowledge.

I apologize to the hundreds of thousands of hard working postal service works that could possibly be affected by this solution.  But there are solutions to relieving people of work as well.  Early retirement is a possible solution for a percentage of employees.  Which is occurring already. 

When large corporations down size, it is no easy task but out of survival instinct to remain afloat and continue supporting more employees than released, a select few are let go.  How employees are selected to be released is a per company decision, my guess they are going to look at cost of employee vs. output of employee work.

The United States Postal Service is a prime example of why the federal government should not be in the market place.  Many federal branches if released from government control would flourish.  While the big government types stay in power, they will keep their strangle hold on as much as they can for as long as they can.

Who wants the USPS to become a success to our economy rather than a drag?  How do we make it a success?

 Easy: USPS for SALE!

Jared Taylor